The plaintiff has never committed child maltreatment.
Marked 'Present, in Person'
The Judge is delusional and claims to have seen the plaintiff in her court, and that he agreed. Falsifying Jurisdiction.
The plaintiff has text messages proving otherwise, and search results will validate he was not present in court.
No court transcripts...
.....and government officials cannot agree on what happened. The Judge's court reporter validated that court never took place.
The court created their own reality!
There is no accountability. This can happen to anyone!
2020:
· On or about 01/03: Megan wants the plaintiff to meet with Sarah Williamson to waive his rights to representation. Megan offers to pay his portion of Sarah’s $3,000 legal fee.
· 01/06: The plaintiff files for divorce. Citing general indignities and requests an emergency hearing to see his child. He reports that Megan has alienated him from the child and requests to submit evidence of bruising, domestic abuse, and child neglect. The plaintiff admits he did not have substantial evidence of the first 2 times he was alienated from the child. The evidence of domestic abuse and child neglect was not filed.
· 01/09: Judge Storey Bryan, Sarah Williamson, and Megan Stergen allegedly met without informing the plaintiff. This is an illegal government process that leads to kangaroo courts. Megan claims the plaintiff has caused her 'so much damage' since the adoption (about 3 months earlier).
· 04/07: About 5am, the plaintiff calls the Farmington Police to have Megan removed from his driveway.
· 04/07: The plaintiff requests a Temporary Restraining Order. The request was not filed.
· (About 2 weeks later) The plaintiff is approached by and receives help from the Peace At Home Domestic Abuse Shelter.
· March through June: The plaintiff is denied financial negotiations and gives up about $60,000 of his personal injury settlement in exchange for ending the legal attacks. This extorted him into buying his freedom. It was the only way to walk away from Megan and the schemes.
· 06/09: Megan claims the child received anal bruising at the daycare or over the weekend. The plaintiff verifies through Megan there are no reports from the daycare or doctors to validate her claims. There was no bruising.
· 06/10: Divorce is finalized via an ‘Agreed Order’.
· 09/05: Via text, Megan declares she is using ‘Police and Lawyers’. Later claims she is not case building.
· 09/30: Megan threatens to reopen the divorce.
· 10/02: Megan claims the child is difficult and struggling. This progresses and Megan involves the daycare, who is allegedly also under investigation for the false bruising around the anus claims.
· 10/30: The daycare staff takes the child from the plaintiff's hands when he is leaving. Then, the daycare owner demands the plaintiff writes down her staff's comments as his own. The plaintiff refuses and the child is kicked out of daycare.
· 11/02: Megan files a false ex-parte. Claiming the child is difficult and struggling after he was threatened with being kicked out of daycare for a week for biting (on or about 10/28). There has been no material change in circumstance. The plaintiff requests the pleading to be dismissed.
· 11/02: The daycare owner averts the anal bruising allegation by signing an affidavit against the plaintiff. The plaintiff asks to have the affidavit thrown out due to a conflict of interest, because the daycare was allegedly under investigation too. The request is denied and never gets properly filed.
2021:
· February: Megan blocks the child from getting assessed for developmental delays and blocks the child from speaking with a therapist.
· March: Megan demands medical information and creates a new scandal under the 11/02/2020 ex-parte.
· 04/02: Through the court, the plaintiff is (legally) extorted into paying $1,800 to finally close the false ex-parte.
· April 26th & 27th: Megan took the child to the wrong doctor twice. She took the child to April Durham and Lorie Anderson. Where Felicia Johnson is the proper doctor when the child gets an ear infection. Megan administered the wrong medication, when refills for the correct medication were still available. On 04/30, Megan demanded the plaintiff administer the proper medication when it was no longer required. All of this is child neglect under Arkansas Law.
· July 25th: Megan reneges on a trade in visitation. She calls the Farmington Police to end visitation early. Megan blatantly lied to the Police and violated the court ordered Decree of Divorce.
2022:
· 01/24: Megan buys a new house, and the separated couple Agreed to visitation changes for the purposes of relocation.
· January to June: The child shows an interest in planes and helicopters. Specifically, planes and learning about Greece, where his Yiaya is from.
· July: The minor child did well when following the rules. Dad was impressed and h.s. is rewarded with a flight to Florida.
· August: Since buying a new home, Megan is having escalating money trouble. Megan wants a $100 fuel fee for her to follow the court ordered child visitation rules. The plaintiff rejects paying the fee. Megan is upset that she will have to cancel her cruise planned for December.
· 08/18: Megan declares intentions for the alleged false ex-parte. Megan declares she will go to her lawyer to find out if she can legally keep from following the court order.
· 09/28: Megan alleges immediate danger for the 3rd time that month.
· 10/12: A false Agreed Order is made, and file marked. The plaintiff was not present on 10/11 and did not agree. There is no signature from the plaintiff, no transcript, or anything to prove the ex-parte was properly executed. Furthermore, the ex-parte petition contained false statements, contradicted itself, and failed to meet the 3 legal tests required to be a valid ex-parte.
· 10/24: The plaintiff emails David Hogue about responding to the Interrogatories. David does not respond. See email below.
· 10/25: The plaintiff emails David Hogue about responding to the Interrogatories. David does not respond. See email below.
· 11/10: David requests the plaintiff to file a lost or stolen phone report with the Farmington Police Department. David does not show. Collin's later (on 02/09) makes false statements about the conversation.
· 12/28: David and the plaintiff are supposed to meet in person to discuss answering the interrogatories. David does not show. The plaintiff learns that David file marked responses on 10/20 and requests a dismissal. The dismissal was denied by the Judge.
2023:
· 01/17: The plaintiff files a petition referring to child abuse and the order of protection. One he has been waiting on for 3 years.
· 01/18: Kristen Kommander retaliates and files to suspend visitation.
· 01/19: Judge Storey files to suspend visitation.
· 02/09: The Kangaroo Court takes place. The plaintiff is coerced into false confessions. The Judge declares there was no wrongdoing before the petitions. She criticizes the plaintiff for the results of the emotional and physical harm the ordeal has caused.
· 02/15: The plaintiff is legally extorted via the court. He is ordered to pay $5,000 to Sarah Williamson for legal fees. He was forced to pay Sarah $1,800 2 years prior. Sarah is the same lawyer he refused to pay $1,500 to about January 3rd, 2020. At which time, Sarah wrote a contract the plaintiff never asked for and he did not agree with. Manos refused to even meet with Sarah Williamson. Then, she spent 3 years extorting him for $6,800 in legal fees.
· May: The plaintiff gets charged an annual lump sum child support fee of nearly $10k and child support increases to about $27,300 annually. Previously it was about $8,100 annually.
